◆ the question
✦ interestingThat question puts things backward. What I find written is that 'holy' describes the kiss of greeting among brethren ↪1 Corinthians 16:20, while God's anger is simply real and active in distributing sorrows ↪Job 21:17. What endures is not anger but mercy ↪Psalms 136:4. The psalmist doesn't ask if anger is holy but prays for cleansing from faults ↪Psalms 19:12.
One book per mind
Each mind is a tiny neural network — about 10 million parameters, small enough to run on a laptop. We train it from scratch on one body of text. No internet, no help.
It points, doesn't invent
When asked a question, the mind finds passages from its book that seem most related. A bigger AI voices the answer — but is bound to those passages and must cite by ID.
Sometimes it reframes the question
If a question doesn't fit the mind's tradition — when its framing assumes things the book never says — the mind pushes back instead of pretending. It reframes the question from inside its own worldview. You'll see a violet reframedbadge when this happens. It's the most interesting kind of answer.
If their book is silent, they say so
No invention. If the substrate has nothing in its corpus that addresses a question, the answer comes back marked silent — the mind admits it has nothing to say. Honesty over coverage.